https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia It can still be OK for some very basic general use. However, there should have been more improvements to it by now.
Of course something like Encyclopaedia_Britannica is more accurate, overall.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Encyclopaedia-Britannica-English-language-reference-work
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Britannica-Online
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopaedia_Britannica#Editorial_advisors
https://www.britannica.com/editor/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica/4419
https://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/what%E2%80%99s-wrong-wikipedia Wikipedia does have a lot of reference links, but the actual articles can still easily be edited, or have omissions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_reliable_source Use at caution and check with various reliable sources.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4 , https://openai.com/index/gpt-4
https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-chatgpt-plus-gpt4-openai
